Peer Refereeing . . . Will it be Missed ? Alfred

نویسنده

  • Alfred J. van der Poorten
چکیده

1. Publish essentially as is; the only changes necessary are very simple typographical matters which can be changed by the editor. 2. Publish after author’s minor revision; the referee suggests points which must be changed before the paper meets the standards for publication. 3. Publish only if the author makes major revisions. (Perhaps the paper is much too long or is badly written. The revised paper will be refereed again.) 4. Reject. (There is nothing salvageable.)

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 1. Opinion and Conjecture on the Effectiveness of Refereeing

Peer review is so much a part of the fabric of scholarly inquiry that it is often taken for granted. I have written many essays over the years that are directly or indirectly related to peer review. These include several on authorshipl-~ and editing, ~ faculty evaluation, ~ identifying Nobel-class science through citation analysis~-~—and even a few on various aspects of refereeing itself. l~lz ...

متن کامل

Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 2. The Research on Refereeing and Alternatives to the Present System

Continuing our discussion of refereeing, which focused on complaints about the system in Part 1,1 we now examine the empirical research on the subject, the anecdotal literature supporting the current system, and some of the suggestions for improving it. Part 3 will appear at a later date and will discuss the peer review of grant proposals. Again we will review the considerable literature of opi...

متن کامل

Peer-reading Process and Its Ethical Challenges: Can We Hope for Moral Judgment?

Background: The role of refereeing and peer-reading in the ethics of research and publishing is very privileged and vital, and changes have occurred in this important part of scientific communication over the years. Despite the diversity in scientific judgments and the criticisms and challenges that have been brought to its implementation and nature, it is still accepted as a social norm in the...

متن کامل

No-Fault Peer Review Charges: The Price of Selectivity Need Not Be Access Denied or Delayed

Plans by universities and research funders to pay the costs of Open Access Publishing ("Gold OA") are premature. Funds are short; 80% of journals (including virtually all the top journals) are still subscription-based, tying up the potential funds to pay for Gold OA; the asking price for Gold OA is still high; and there is concern that paying to publish may inflate acceptance rates and lower qu...

متن کامل

Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 4. Research on the peer review of grant proposals and suggestions for improvement

This is the conclusion to a four-part series on refereeing and peer review in science. The first two parts discussed the refereeing of scholarly articles prior to publication. 1.2 The third part focused on the mechanics of the peer-review system for the evaluation of research-grant proposals at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and opinions about ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003